1. Primer for a Touchy Subject
I know this is a touchy subject and have heard all sorts of arguments for and against the topic of horse slaughter. One common misconception about the “ban” on horse slaughter in the United States was that the practice was altogether banned — that is not the case. Continue reading
“125 Best Foods for Men”
Last week in the Des Moines airport I picked up a copy of Men’s Health to read during my flights back to State College. It’s been awhile since I purchased a printed magazine because I usually read them on my iPad (yes, I’m one of those people) — but I can only take so much SkyMall reading during that pesky “below 10,000 feet no electronics” rule. I’m glad I picked up the mag because it featured a pullout poster identifying the “125 Best Foods For Men.”
My first observation was that everything on this list was in some way processed and pre-packaged. When I found the article online, the page tab read “The Best Packaged Foods…” Tallying through the list, 25 of the 125 products featured the word “organic” in the product name; however, in the brief note explaining how items were chosen it was never stated that a preference was given organic or otherwise “natural” items (but I have to wonder).
The last section of the list was the Proteins section. There are a few points of concern worth addressing:
(1) In the description of #119, the best ground turkey, one of the justifications included was that it had “no added hormones, steroids.” Point of clarification: Added hormones or steroids are not used in poultry production in the United States. This should be in fine print on the product label.
(2) #120 describes the bacon as having no added nitrates. Point of clarification: Sea salt and certain vegetable juice powders (commonly celery) are used as a naturally-occuring source of nitrate. This should also be included in the fine print on the product label. Even the corporate web site addresses this and says those ingredients are in their products. (Kudos for the thorough explanation, Applegate.)
(3) These are the only two items on the entire list that feature an absence claim (i.e. “No [this or that].”) Why not the other products? Not even dairy?
Novel Beef Safety Intervention in the Spotlight
Yesterday morning a reader forwarded me a video released by Beef Products, Inc. (BPI), highlighting an announcement that the company is going to start testing all of their product for non-O157 STEC’s before releasing it into commerce. If you remember, BPI is the South Dakota-based company whose lean beef recovery process came under fire in early 2010. It was the subject of a New York Times article in which the headline questioned the product’s safety.
Everybody has their food safety opinions, myself included
Whether one is professionally representing some agricultural industry segment or one’s farming or ranching operation, it seems that nowadays everybody is a food safety expert. It does not matter whether you have farmed all of your life or are new to farming, studied finance or history or underwater basketweaving, somehow — as if by magic — you are qualified to provide expert commentary on nearly anything related to food safety. Continue reading
This is just a quick blurb about recall information that FSIS has published on their website. The case archive is a pretty handy tool, and lists details about each recall case. Recalls have been listed by year and go back to 1994. Continue reading
I don’t know how I missed this … earlier this month, USDA’s Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS) launched “Mobile Ask Karen,” an mobile version of their web-based Q&”A” outreach program, Ask Karen. Continue reading
A recap and “high points” of our recent visit to Polyface Farms
It had been months in the making, our visit to Polyface, Inc. None of us can remember the exact details of how our group was formed, but it did, and we had the opportunity to get a private tour of this enterprise from Mr. Joel Salatin himself. Continue reading